ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of functional movement assessment on the recurrence of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after treat-to-target therapy.Methods:The clinical data of 61 patients with AS in Chengdu were collected including clinical symptoms and AS disease activity (ASDAS). After 24 weeks adalimumab treatment, motor function score of AS patients(ASDAS<1.3) was assessed by functional movement screen (FMS), then adalimumab was discontinued and the rest of the concurrent drugs were continued until the disease relapse or up to 1 year. The data of the two groups were compared using t-test analysis and Cox proportionate hazard model. Results:① The recurrence rate of patients with AS after treat-to-target therapy within 1 year follow-up was 57.4%; ② The recurrence group was younger [(27±7) vs (31±6), t=5.96, P=0.02], the ASADAS value was at the high end when adalimumab was withdrawal [(1.29±0.07) vs (0.87±0.16), t=177.31, P<0.01], and the FMS value was lower after treat-to-target [(12.9±2.7) vs (16.2±1.9), t=29.23, P<0.01], The time to reaching the treatment target was longer [(2.9±1.2) month vs (1.7±0.6) month, t=19.89, P<0.01] than the stable group; ③ The cut-off value of the FMS test of AS patients after treat-to-target therapy was 14.25 (sensitivity was 84.6%, specificity was 80%) . The time to treat-to-target was a risk factor for recurrence ( RR=2.285, P<0.05), and the FMS value after treat-to-target was a protective factor ( RR=0.625, P<0.05). Conclusion:After discontinuing the adalimumab, about half of the patients relapse. The time reaching the treatment target and the FMS value after treat-to-target therapy are the risk factors for disease recurrence.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of baseline function movement assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on treatment outcomes.Methods:The clinical data of 90 patients with AS who met the medical insurance treatment for major disease in Chengdu were collected including clinical symptoms, functional movement screen (FMS) and ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) after 24 weeks adalimumab treatment. They were divided into the non-treat-to-target group and the non-treat-to target group based on the ASDAS score, t-test or χ2 test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influence of baseline FMS on the outcome of patients reaching the treatment target. Results:① The two groups were different in the FMS [(15.8±2.3) vs (12. 6±2.5), t=6.17, P<0.001], squat [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.7±0.5), t=3.57, P=0.001], hurdle spanning [(2.2±0.7) vs (1.8±0.6), t=2.11, P=0.038], straight lunge [(2.3±0.7) vs (1.7±0.5), t=4.23, P<0.001], shoulder flexibility [(2.5±0.6) vs (2.2±0.8), t=2.21, P=0.037], active straight leg raise [(2.1±0.6) vs (1.8±0.6), t=2.35, P=0.021], spinal stabilization pushups [(2.4±0.7) vs (1.8±0.8), t=3.76, P<0.001], body rotation stability [(2.2±0.7) vs (1.6±0.8), t=3.42, P=0.001] at baseline. ② The two groups were different in ASDAS score [(0.96±0.28) vs (2.19±0.52), t=14.69, P=0.000], FMS [(17.4±1.9) vs (12.7±2.8), t=9.77, P<0.001], deep squat [(2.6±0.5) vs (1.5±0.5), t=9.09, P<0.001], hurdle step [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.8±0.8), t=2.80, P=0.006], straight lunge [(2.6±0.6) vs (1.8±0.9), t=4.85, P<0.001], shoulder flexibility [(2.8±0.4) vs (2.5±0.5), t=2.10, P=0.038], active straight leg raise [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.9±0.8), t=2.46, P=0.016], spinal stability push-ups [(2.8±0.4) vs (1.6±0.7), t=10.36, P<0.001], and body rotation stability [(2.3±0.7) vs (1.6±0.8), t=4.76, P<0.001] at the end of the observation. ③ The cut-off value of the FMS for predicting whether AS patients meet the standard at baseline was 14.25 points (Sensitivity 0.733, specificity 0.800). ④ Logistic regression results showed that in the baseline, FMS series of action tests, squat [ OR (95% CI)=0.155 (0.035, 0.677), P=0.013], straight lunge [ OR (95% CI)=0.375 (0.148, 0.953), P=0.039], spinal stability push-ups [ OR(95% CI)=0.136(0.043, 0.436), P=0.001], and body rotation stability [ OR(95% CI)=0.308 (0.121, 0.780), P=0.013] were the influencing factors of the AS patient's treatment outcome ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The AS patients in the non-treat-to-target group have better FMS tests at baseline and at the end of the study than the non-treat-to-target group. Squats, straight lunges, remember stable push-ups, and body rotation stability are the influencing factors for the treatment outcomes of AS patients at baseline.